参考:泛阿拉伯青运“输出革命”

<w:LatentStyles DefLockedState=“false” LatentStyleCount=“156”>
</w:LatentStyles>
<![endif]–><!–[if !mso]>

st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) }

<![endif]–><!–[if gte mso 10]>

/* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:普通表格; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

<![endif]–>

按:革命尚未成功,同志仍需努力,世界革命形势浩浩荡荡,顺之者昌,逆之者亡。


赴塞尔维亚取经颜色革命 泛阿拉伯青运“输出革命”

 

(美国 华盛顿15日讯)突尼西亚和埃及相继起革命,震动阿拉伯世界。《纽约时报》周一披露,原来突尼西亚和埃及的政治活跃青年,两年来一直利用面子书(facebook)互通声气。

 

两国青年交流如何利用网络科技逃避监视搞抗争,结合宗教运动的纪律以至球迷的热情,加上精密盘算,催生出一场泛阿拉伯青年运动。

 

报导指出,他们除了参考非暴力抗争策略,还远赴塞尔维亚,向颜色革命学运取经,更借用了硅谷的市场推广策略。突尼西亚及埃及变天后,这群年轻人已放眼向其它阿拉伯国家“输出革命”。

 

推邻国变天 锁定利比亚伊朗

 

发动埃及革命的“46日青年运动”成员拉希德说:“突尼西亚是推动埃及的力量,埃及将成为推动世界的力量。”

 

该组织是125日示威的主要搞手,引爆了埃及反zf浪潮。随着革命成功,拉希德正跟伙伴商讨,如何跟利比亚、阿尔及利亚、摩洛哥及伊朗的青年运动分享经验。“若每个阿拉伯国家都有一小群人走出来,像我们那样不屈不挠,那就是所有政权的末日了。”

 

埃及革命酝酿多年

青年面子书互相请教

 

埃及革命其实酝酿了好几年。

 

46”主要搞手马希尔,2005年参加名为Kefaya(够了)运动,另成立了“求变青年”组织,但参加人数不多,领导被捕,成员大都离开,改为加入一些合法的反对党。2008年起,不少年轻搞手开始转战网络,当部落客,为不满私有化和通胀的零星工潮打气。

 

马希尔当年号召46日全国大罢工,为此更成立了面子书群组宣传。因天气恶劣,大罢工不成气候。但数月后,突尼西亚有城市发生罢工,突尼西亚年轻人也像埃及一样成立网上群组,两国搞手开始在面子书互相请教,网络技术较好的埃及青年,教突尼西亚青年如何用科技绕过网络监控,工会传统较强的突尼西亚青年,则教导对方如何组织。

 

同时,马希尔等人亦向参与推翻米诺西维奇的塞尔维亚青年运动Otpor(意为“抵抗”)取经,该组织参考了美国政治学家夏普的非暴力斗争理念,认为非暴力是对付警察国家最有效的方法。“46”部份成员甚至远赴塞尔维亚跟Otpor成员见面。

 

“变革学院”幕后推手之一

 

一群30多岁的海外埃及人在卡塔尔成立的“变革学院”(Academy of Change),亦是埃及革命的幕后推手。一名跟“46”合作搞示威的年轻人法特希说:“变革学院像马克思,我们就像(付诸行动的)列宁。”法特希亦是埃及民主学院的计划总监,该计划专注促进人权及选举监察,获美国拨款。在埃及18天示威期间,他凭着人脉关系,从埃及商人筹得5100美元来买帐篷和毡子。

 

1年前,埃及青年运动得到另一盟友,就是31岁任职Google推广部的戈宁。戈宁忆述:“我是搞市场推广的,我深明若你用心打造品牌,人家便会信你的品牌。”他运用其市场推广知识,协助这个没有严密组织的青年运动,设立一个面子书群组,在群组上载大批警员暴力的影片及新闻,结果吸引万计用户加入,慢慢透过组织网上参与来增加凝聚力。

 

戈宁利用面子书动员

 

突尼西亚114爆发革命,“46”见时机成熟,决定扩大原订125“警察日”举行年度示威的规模。戈宁利用面子书来动员,当时的盘算是,若至少有5万人表示会参与,示威将举行。最后有超过10万人参加。

 

马希尔忆述:“当我看到示威规模时,我便知道政权末日到了。”

 

纸皮胶樽制土炮盔甲

 

早在示威前一周,变革学院派出成员到开罗训练示威搞手。在警方用催泪弹驱散示威后,示威搞手128再发起更有组织的“愤怒日”游行。刚打赢街头战争的突尼西亚青年向埃及青年授招,埃及青年也听从建议,带备柠檬、和醋,以备催泪弹发射时可用来嗅,又带备苏打水及牛奶来洗眼。有示威者则用纸皮和胶樽制成土炮盔甲,带备喷漆作武器。大示威前夕,他们更制作了示威指南手册派发。示威者定下车轮战策略,一受伤便后退,由其它人取代其位置,继续跟警方作战。经过5小时激战,示威者取得胜利,烧掉执政党总部,占领解放广场。

 

最初没有参加示威的穆斯林兄弟会也改变立场,下令成员到解放广场,并扮演了领导角色。

 

穆巴拉克支持者跟示威者大战,在广场戒备的军人一直袖手旁观。到穆巴拉克支持者向示威者开鎗,军人终介入制止。军方最终在迫使穆巴拉克下台扮演了关键角色。


2月10日,埃及副总统苏莱曼致电美国副总统拜登报讯,华府理解为苏莱曼将接过埃及总统实权。但穆巴拉克当晚的演说却出乎意外。埃及传媒昨称,穆巴拉克原定宣布辞职,将权力交给苏莱曼,但其子贾迈勒却将原文大幅修改,临场促穆巴拉克不要妥协。贾迈勒的兄长阿莱当晚不满演辞被改,跟贾迈勒起争执,要官员把两人分开。阿莱指摘贾迈勒在政府安插亲信,贪赃枉法,令父亲晚节不保。

全国爆工潮争待遇

穆巴拉克的演说,结果没有如外界预期辞职,令军方忍无可忍。军方肯定华府会支持后,决定再施压,穆巴拉克翌日下台。古奈姆说:「噩梦已结束,是时候梦想了。」包括他在内的8名年轻示威搞手,周日还首次跟埃及军方见面,跟军方就改革交换意见,古奈姆称军方鼓励他们组织政党。

但革命成功后埃及仍面临不少考验,政治抗争刚完结,全国罢工潮便告爆发。有埃及追踪工运的压力团体昨称,银行、交通、石油、旅游业、纺织、国营传媒及政府部门的员工都正在罢工,争取加薪及改善待遇。

埃及示威者在开罗解放广场抗争18日,成功推翻穆巴拉克,背后绝非偶然,而是花了至少两年的经营和部署。图为穆巴拉克下台后,解放广场上民众放烟花庆祝。

[ 本帖最后由 classwar 于 2011-2-16 10:30 编辑 ]

埃及抗议活动幕后策划揭秘

埃及反对派本周接管议会附近的地区,这一切都是从一个小计策开始的。

周四,在埃及议会大厦前,一名男孩在高喊反政府口号。起先,他们呼吁在解放广场(Tahrir Squar)北面几个街区外的国家电视台大楼外进行示威游行。解放广场是反对派的大本营。当军队在电视台这一敏感地区部署兵力的时候,他们却朝广场南面议会附近兵力较少的地区前进。

这一声东击西之计让我们多少了解了十几个年轻的积极分子是如何智胜人人畏惧的埃及安全部队,发动一场具有历史意义的抗议活动,同时也暗示了组织者希望如何向拒绝下台的政府继续施压。抗议活动现已进入第17天。

1月25日,抗议活动的第一天。在开罗西边的贫民窟Bulaqal-Dakrour,组织者想出了一条锦囊妙计。

在泥泞狭窄彷佛迷宫般的小巷中,一队看似自发的抗议人群让安全部队紧追不舍。就在安全部队还未来得及将这批抗议人群制服之际,人群的规模迅速扩大。

这支示威游行的队伍可不是自发的。由于此前太多的努力都失败了,所以人们始终无法弄清这次活动的策划者是如何成功做到的。

谷歌公司中东业务的负责人高尼姆(Wael Ghonim)上周日获释后,向人们描述了他和埃及政府新上任的内政部长会面的情形。这位内政部长告诉高尼姆,没人知道这帮人是怎么做到的。高尼姆说,审讯他的人断言一定有外部势力介入。

此次活动的策划者近日来首次和大家分享了他们的秘密。这批策划者已经成为“革命青年运动”(Revolutionary Youth Movement)的领导核心。“革命青年运动”已经成了解放广场上的抗议者们的代表。

他们的描述展现了一小群经验丰富的策划者。他们利用前面讲过的“诱饵游行”在安全部队面前智领先机,并用充满智慧的政治活动取得了公众对他们游行的广泛支持。

突尼斯的内乱将总统本•阿里(Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali)赶下了台。一月初,当他们决定尝试复制突尼斯示威者的成功时,他们的首要关切是如何智胜内政部,后者管辖下的大批防暴警察多年来一直在遏制和镇压各类游行示威活动。在遏制示威游行势头、阻碍游行路线并让普通埃及百
姓远离示威等方面,这批警察很是内行。

41岁的建筑师卡梅(Basem Kamel)说,他们必须找到一个办法绕过安全部队的封锁和阻挠。卡梅是巴拉迪(Mohamed ElBaradei)青年团的成员,也是这十几个幕后策划者之一。两周来,他们每天碰头一次,地点是阿里米(Ziad al-Alimi)母亲家局促的起居室。阿里米是巴拉迪组织的反对团体的主要领导人,也是幕后主要策划者之一。

阿里米的母亲曾是激进分子, 1977 年“ 面包暴动”(bread riots)期间,她曾因领导抗议活动被监禁6个月,现在她住在尼罗河西岸Agouza的中产阶级社区。

参与秘密策划的包括与反对政治党派相关的六个青年运动的代表, 倡导劳动权利的组织, 以及穆斯林兄弟会(Muslim Brotherhood)。

他们选了20个抗议地点,这些地方一般都与清真寺相连,散布于开罗人口密集的工薪阶层社区,他们希望为数众多的分散抗议令安全部队疲于应付,吸引大量民众,并使一部分人更有可能突出重围与市中心的解放广场接上头。

组织者在1月25日公开呼吁在这些地点举行抗议,这天是为广受批评的埃及警察部队设立的“警察日”,全国放假一天。组织者在网上公布示威地点,并号召抗议者做完祷告后在下午两点左右分别在各地开始抗议。但事情不止于此。

卡梅说,没人知道还有第21个地点。

确切地说,他们并非当天号召抗议的唯一组织。其他有影响力的激进组织也集结资源助了一臂之力。数月前,年轻的萨伊德(Khaled Said)不明不白地被亚历山大警察打死后,他的Facebook页面早就成了埃及激进分子的网上据点。页面有阿拉伯语和英语两个版本,分别由不同的管理员管理。谷歌高管高尼姆现在被确认是其中一名管理员,但其他管理员的身份仍不得而知。

英文页面的一名管理员通过Gmail聊天工具接受了《华尔街日报》采访。他只公开了网名埃尔-沙伊德(El-Shaheed)或殉道者(The Martyr)。他在采访中叙述了这些管理员在抗议中担任的角色。

埃尔-沙伊德说,1月14日传出突尼斯总统本•阿里(Ben Ali)逃离出境的消息时,他正与阿拉伯语页面的管理员网上聊天。早就开始策划抗议的卡梅及他的同伴现在又多了一个强大的人员募集渠道。

埃尔-沙伊德说,当时我在和阿拉伯语页面管理员交谈,我们在关注突尼斯,当我们听到本•阿里逃走时,他说,我们得做点什么。

这位阿拉伯语页面管理员在阿拉伯语页面上向读者提出一个问题:你认为在警察日我们应该给粗暴的埃及警察送什么礼物?

埃尔-沙伊德写道,每个人的答案都是:突尼斯,突尼斯:)。在抗议前的最后三天,卡梅和他的同伴们没在家睡,他们怕警察会在半夜逮捕他们,从而打乱计划。他们暂停使用自己的手机,而使用家人或朋友的手机,因为亲友的手机被监听的可能性较小。

他们派出小股队伍前往位于Bulaq al-Dakrour社区的第21个秘密地点侦察。这个地点就是“海伊斯甜品店”(Hayiss Sweet Shop),其门面和用于在暖和季节放置户外餐桌的地砖人行道广场都很容易辨认,适合集会。如果没有这个地方,这一带就是一片乱糟糟的社区,和城市的其他无数社区没有两样。

策划者知道,示威成功与否,取决于Bulaq al-Dakrour等工薪阶层社区的老百姓是否参与,在这些社区,互联网和Facebook不是那么普及。示威发生的前几天,他们在城市各地散发传单,主要集中在Bulaq al-Dakrour社区。

卡梅说,这让人们知道,一场革命将在1月25日开始。组织者派出小股策划者在示威进行的前几天以不同速度反复行走游行路线,把时间记下来,看不同示威队伍在什么时候连接起来。

1月25日,安全部队不出所料地部署在每一个已公布示威地点的数千人旁边。与此同时,组织者委员会挑选的四名现场指挥开始下令他们所负责的人员前往海伊斯甜品店。

组织者将他们自己分为10个单元,每个单元只有一个人知道秘密的目的地。

示威者以这些小组为单位前往海伊斯甜品店,汇聚成一个不受警察控制的300人示威队伍。据目睹现场进展的海伊斯甜品店员工说,看到安全部队不在场,社区居民成百上千地从社区狭窄的巷道里涌出,使队伍膨胀到数千人。

下午1点15分,他们开始朝着开罗市中心行进。到警方意识到这支队伍并重新派出小分队封堵道路时,示威者人数已经迅速扩大到轻易超过警方力量的水平。

其他在全市各地清真寺组织的队伍受防暴警察封锁线阻拦,未能抵达解放广场。只有Bulaq al-Dakrour社区的示威队伍抵达了目标,他们占领解放广场数小时,直到午夜过后警察动用催泪瓦斯和橡皮子弹。

这样一种街头示威是埃及人第一次见到,形成了一个一触即发的临界点。人们认为,正是这样一种临界点鼓动数十万人出门参加了接下来那个周五的示威活动。

那天他们再次占领解放广场,此后就没有放弃过。

Revolutionary Youth Movement

Basem Kamel

Wael Ghonim

Mohamed ElBaradei

Muslim Brotherhood

Academy of Change

Walid Rachid

Libya, Algeria, Morocco and Iran,Tunisia

Basem Fathy

[ 本帖最后由 classwar 于 2011-2-16 14:09 编辑 ]

Is the Egyptian uprising running out of steam?

With dictator Hosni Mubarak out of the way, the Egyptian uprising is witnessing a cut-throat clash of interests and is struggling to define its future course.

As rivals grapple for political space, the faint outlines of at least two alternatives have become visible. With the conservative old guard minus Mr. Mubarak still in charge of steering the transition, Egypt could become a nominal democracy with a significant authoritarian overhang. Alternatively, if the pro-democracy movement persists and runs its course, it could still get root and branch, a fully representative system, liberated from the suffocating shadow of its military, which has manoeuvred Egypt’s destiny since Gemal Abdel Nasser’s Free Officers Revolution of 1952.

Mr. Mubarak’s unceremonious exit has generated a fierce debate about the still uncharted road that the “revolution” should pursue. Some influential voices are even calling for an end to the uprising, trusting the Supreme Council of Armed Forces — now running the show — including its top boss Field Marshall Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, a long serving Mubarak-loyalist, to take Egypt forward.

Pro-military stand

Foremost among those who want to head home is Wael Ghonim, the Google executive who has emerged as the poster boy of the mainstream western media. Within hours of Mr. Mubarak’s exit, when embers of the fiery celebrations at Tahrir Square were still aglow, Mr. Ghonim tweeted that Egyptians should get back to work. This sounded like treachery to many battle hardened protesters who wanted to head from Tahrir Square to farms and factories in support of Egypt’s embattled working class.

In his next intervention in cyberspace, shortly after he had met two senior military officers — Major-General Mahmoud Hijazi and Major-General Abdel Fattah — on Monday, Mr. Ghonim seemed to confirm his unreserved faith in the military. “We all sensed a sincere desire to preserve the gains of the revolution and unprecedented respect for the right of young people to express their views,” he said.

Contrary to Mr. Ghonim’s exhortations, a much-wider section of the youth wants to keep the agitation on hold to allow the military to announce key reforms within a tight February 18 timeline. After meeting the military top brass on Monday, Ahmed Maher, the leader of the April 6 youth movement, said: “We told them [the military] that if by Friday our demands were not met, we will resume the revolution.”

The April 6 movement is part of a wider “Coalition of Young Revolutionaries”, which has representatives from the Muslim Brotherhood Youth and the young guns deputed by Mohamed ElBaradei, the pro-democracy leader.

For more protests

While not disputing the coalition’s demands, there is another component of the youth movement that wants protests to continue, focusing on supporting the already mobilised workers, who through a rash of industrial shrikes have begun to rock large parts of Egypt.

Advocates of this view include activist Gigi Ibrahim, a strong believer in a “bottom up” democracy, which she says must spiral upwards from the grassroots, free from the influence of the military

Despite the strong indigenous roots of the pro-democracy movement, those who want the movement to flourish have begun to wonder if, in the post-Mubarak phase, a strong inspiration from experiences abroad has begun to creep in.

It is well acknowledged that the Egyptian youth movement in its formative stage had been strongly influenced by the Serbian youth movement, Optor, whose role was indispensible in bringing down the Serbian dictator, Slobodan Milosevic. The New York Times also cites the influence on the Egyptian uprising of the Qatar-based Academy of Change, run by a group of young Egyptian expatriates.

The Internet also allowed activists in Egypt to benefit from the operational experience, including facing teargas barrages, from Tunisian activists, who had only recently successfully toppled the Ben Ali dictatorship.

按:值得关注这段:Bad weather turned the strike into a nonevent in most places, but in Mahalla a demonstration by the workers’ families led to a violent police crackdown — the first major labor confrontation in years.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/14/world/middleeast/14egypt-tunisia-protests.html?pagewanted=all

CAIRO — As protesters in Tahrir Square faced off against pro-government
forces, they drew a lesson from their counterparts in Tunisia: “Advice
to the youth of Egypt: Put vinegar or onion under your scarf for tear
gas.”


The exchange on Facebook
was part of a remarkable two-year collaboration that has given birth to
a new force in the Arab world — a pan-Arab youth movement dedicated to
spreading democracy in a region without it. Young Egyptian and Tunisian
activists brainstormed on the use of technology to evade surveillance,
commiserated about torture and traded practical tips on how to stand up
to rubber bullets and organize barricades.


They fused their secular expertise in social networks with a discipline
culled from religious movements and combined the energy of soccer fans
with the sophistication of surgeons. Breaking free from older veterans
of the Arab political opposition, they relied on tactics of nonviolent
resistance channeled from an American scholar through a Serbian youth
brigade — but also on marketing tactics borrowed from Silicon Valley.

As their swelling protests shook the Egyptian state, they were locked in a virtual tug of war with a leader with a very different vision — Gamal Mubarak, the son of President Hosni Mubarak, a wealthy investment banker and ruling-party power broker. Considered the heir apparent to his father until the youth revolt eliminated any thought of dynastic succession, the younger Mubarak pushed his father to hold on to power even after his top generals and the prime minister were urging an exit, according to American officials who tracked Hosni Mubarak’s final days.

The defiant tone of the president’s speech on Thursday, the officials said, was largely his son’s work.

“He was probably more strident than his father was,” said one American official, who characterized Gamal’s role as “sugarcoating what was for Mubarak a disastrous situation.” But the speech backfired, prompting Egypt’s military to force the president out and assert control of what they promise will be a transition to civilian government.

Now the young leaders are looking beyond Egypt. “Tunis is the force that pushed Egypt, but what Egypt did will be the force that will push the world,” said Walid Rachid, one of the members of the April 6 Youth Movement, which helped organize the Jan. 25 protests that set off the uprising. He spoke at a meeting on Sunday night where the members discussed sharing their experiences with similar youth movements in Libya, Algeria, Morocco and Iran.

“If a small group of people in every Arab country went out and persevered as we did, then that would be the end of all the regimes,” he said, joking that the next Arab summit might be “a coming-out party” for all the ascendant youth leaders.

Bloggers Lead the Way

The Egyptian revolt was years in the making. Ahmed Maher, a 30-year-old civil engineer and a leading organizer of the April 6 Youth Movement, first became engaged in a political movement known as Kefaya, or Enough, in about 2005. Mr. Maher and others organized their own brigade, Youth for Change. But they could not muster enough followers; arrests decimated their leadership ranks, and many of those left became mired in the timid, legally recognized opposition parties. “What destroyed the movement was the old parties,” said Mr. Maher, who has since been arrested four times.

By 2008, many of the young organizers had retreated to their computer keyboards and turned into bloggers, attempting to raise support for a wave of isolated labor strikes set off by government privatizations and runaway inflation.

After a strike that March in the city of Mahalla, Egypt, Mr. Maher and his friends called for a nationwide general strike for April 6. To promote it, they set up a Facebook group that became the nexus of their movement, which they were determined to keep independent from any of the established political groups. Bad weather turned the strike into a nonevent in most places, but in Mahalla a demonstration by the workers’ families led to a violent police crackdown — the first major labor confrontation in years.

Just a few months later, after a strike in Tunisia, a group of young online organizers followed the same model, setting up what became the Progressive Youth of Tunisia. The organizers in both countries began exchanging their experiences over Facebook. The Tunisians faced a more pervasive police state than the Egyptians, with less latitude for blogging or press freedom, but their trade unions were stronger and more independent. “We shared our experience with strikes and blogging,” Mr. Maher recalled.

For their part, Mr. Maher and his colleagues began reading about nonviolent struggles. They were especially drawn to a Serbian youth movement called Otpor, which had helped topple the dictator Slobodan Milosevic by drawing on the ideas of an American political thinker, Gene Sharp. The hallmark of Mr. Sharp’s work is well-tailored to Mr. Mubark’s Egypt: He argues that nonviolence is a singularly effective way to undermine police states that might cite violent resistance to justify repression in the name of stability.

The April 6 Youth Movement modeled its logo — a vaguely Soviet looking red and white clenched fist—after Otpor’s, and some of its members traveled to Serbia to meet with Otpor activists.

Another influence, several said, was a group of Egyptian expatriates in their 30s who set up an organization in Qatar called the Academy of Change, which promotes ideas drawn in part on Mr. Sharp’s work. One of the group’s organizers, Hisham Morsy, was arrested during the Cairo protests and remained in detention.

“The Academy of Change is sort of like Karl Marx, and we are like Lenin,” said Basem Fathy, another organizer who sometimes works with the April 6 Youth Movement and is also the project director at the Egyptian Democratic Academy, which receives grants from the United States and focuses on human rights and election-monitoring. During the protesters’ occupation of Tahrir Square, he said, he used his connections to raise about $5,100 from Egyptian businessmen to buy blankets and tents.

‘This Is Your Country’

Then, about a year ago, the growing Egyptian youth movement acquired a strategic ally, Wael Ghonim, a 31-year-old Google marketing executive. Like many others, he was introduced into the informal network of young organizers by the movement that came together around Mohamed ElBaradei, the Nobel Prize-winning diplomat who returned to Egypt a year ago to try to jump-start its moribund political opposition.

Mr. Ghonim had little experience in politics but an intense dislike for the abusive Egyptian police, the mainstay of the government’s power. He offered his business savvy to the cause. “I worked in marketing, and I knew that if you build a brand you can get people to trust the brand,” he said.

The result was a Facebook group Mr. Ghonim set up: We Are All Khalid Said, after a young Egyptian who was beaten to death by police. Mr. Ghonim — unknown to the public, but working closely with Mr. Maher of the April 6 Youth Movement and a contact from Mr. ElBaradei’s group — said that he used Mr. Said’s killing to educate Egyptians about democracy movements.

He filled the site with video clips and newspaper articles about police violence. He repeatedly hammered home a simple message: “This is your country; a government official is your employee who gets his salary from your tax money, and you have your rights.” He took special aim at the distortions of the official media, because when the people “distrust the media then you know you are not going to lose them,” he said.

He eventually attracted hundreds of thousands of users, building their allegiance through exercises in online democratic participation. When organizers planned a “day of silence” in the Cairo streets, for example, he polled users on what color shirts they should all wear — black or white. (When the revolt exploded, the Mubarak government detained him for 12 days in blindfolded isolation in a belated attempt to stop his work.)

After the Tunisian revolution on Jan. 14, the April 6 Youth Movement saw an opportunity to turn its little-noticed annual protest on Police Day — the Jan. 25 holiday that celebrates a police revolt that was suppressed by the British — into a much bigger event. Mr. Ghonim used the Facebook site to mobilize support. If at least 50,000 people committed to turn out that day, the site suggested, the protest could be held. More than 100,000 signed up.

“I have never seen a revolution that was preannounced before,” Mr. Ghonim said.

By then, the April 6 movement had teamed up with Mr. ElBaradei’s supporters, some liberal and leftist parties, and the youth wing of the Muslim Brotherhood to plaster Cairo with eye-catching modernist posters advertising their Tunisia-inspired Police Day protest. But their elders — even members of the Brotherhood who had long been portrayed as extremists by Mr. Mubarak and the West — shied away from taking to the streets.

Explaining that Police Day was supposed to honor the fight against British colonialism, Essem Erian, a Brotherhood leader, said, “On that day we should all be celebrating together.

“All these people are on Facebook, but do we know who they are?” he asked. “We cannot tie our parties and entities to a virtual world.”

‘This Was It’

When the 25th came, the coalition of young activists, almost all of them affluent, wanted to tap into the widespread frustration with the country’s autocracy, and also with the grinding poverty of Egyptian life. They started their day trying to rally poor people with complaints about pocketbook issues: “They are eating pigeon and chicken, but we eat beans every day.”

By the end of the day, when tens of thousands had marched to Tahrir Square, their chants had become more sweeping. “The people want to bring down the regime,” they shouted, a slogan that the organizers said they had read in signs and on Facebook pages from Tunisia. Mr. Maher of the April 6 Youth Movement said the organizers even debated storming Parliament and the state television building — classic revolutionary moves.

“When I looked around me and I saw all these unfamiliar faces in the protests, and they were more brave than us — I knew that this was it for the regime,” Mr. Maher said.

It was then that they began to rely on advice from Tunisia, Serbia and the Academy of Change, which had sent staff members to Cairo a week before to train the protest organizers. After the police used tear gas to break up the protest that Tuesday, the organizers came back better prepared for their next march on Friday, the 28th, the “Day of Rage.”

This time, they brought lemons, onions and vinegar to sniff for relief from the tear gas, and soda or milk to pour into their eyes. Some had fashioned cardboard or plastic bottles into makeshift armor worn under their clothes to protect against riot police bullets. They brought spray paint to cover the windshields of police cars, and they were ready to stuff the exhaust pipes and jam the wheels to render them useless. By the early afternoon, a few thousand protesters faced off against well over a thousand heavily armed riot police officers on the four-lane Kasr al-Nile Bridge in perhaps the most pivotal battle of the revolution.

“We pulled out all the tricks of the game — the Pepsi, the onion, the vinegar,” said Mr. Maher, who wore cardboard and plastic bottles under his sweater, a bike helmet on his head and a barrel-top shield on his arm. “The strategy was the people who were injured would go to the back and other people would replace them,” he said. “We just kept rotating.” After more than five hours of battle, they had finally won — and burned down the empty headquarters of the ruling party on their way to occupy Tahrir Square.

Pressuring Mubarak

In Washington that day, President Obama turned up, unexpectedly, at a 3:30 p.m. Situation Room meeting of his “principals,” the key members of the national security team, where he displaced Thomas E. Donilon, the national security adviser, from his seat at the head of the table.

The White House had been debating the likelihood of a domino effect since youth-driven revolts had toppled President Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali in Tunisia, even though the American intelligence community and Israel’s intelligence services had estimated that the risk to President Mubarak was low — less than 20 percent, some officials said.

According to senior officials who participated in Mr. Obama’s policy debates, the president took a different view. He made the point early on, a senior official said, that “this was a trend” that could spread to other authoritarian governments in the region, including in Iran. By the end of the 18-day uprising, by a White House count, there were 38 meetings with the president about Egypt. Mr. Obama said that this was a chance to create an alternative to “the Al Qaeda narrative” of Western interference.

American officials had seen no evidence of overtly anti-American or anti-Western sentiment. “When we saw people bringing their children to Tahrir Square, wanting to see history being made, we knew this was something different,” one official said.

On Jan. 28, the debate quickly turned to how to pressure Mr. Mubarak in private and in public — and whether Mr. Obama should appear on television urging change. Mr. Obama decided to call Mr. Mubarak, and several aides listened in on the line. Mr. Obama did not suggest that the 82-year-old leader step aside or transfer power. At this point, “the argument was that he really needed to do the reforms, and do them fast,” a senior official said. Mr. Mubarak resisted, saying the protests were about outside interference.

According to the official, Mr. Obama told him, “You have a large portion of your people who are not satisfied, and they won’t be until you make concrete political, social and economic reforms.”

The next day, the decision was made to send former Ambassador Frank G. Wisner to Cairo as an envoy. Mr. Obama began placing calls to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey and other regional leaders.

The most difficult calls, officials said, were with King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia and Mr. Netanyahu, who feared regional instability and urged the United States to stick with Mr. Mubarak. According to American officials, senior members of the government in Saudi Arabia argued that the United States should back Mr. Mubarak even if he used force against the demonstrators. By Feb. 1, when Mr. Mubarak broadcast a speech pledging that he would not run again and that elections would be held in September, Mr. Obama concluded that the Egyptian president still had not gotten the message.

Within an hour, Mr. Obama called Mr. Mubarak again in the toughest, and last, of their conversations. “He said if this transition process drags out for months, the protests will, too,” one of Mr. Obama’s aides said.

Mr. Mubarak told Mr. Obama that the protests would be over in a few days.

Mr. Obama ended the call, the official said, with these words: “I respect my elders. And you have been in politics for a very long time, Mr. President. But there are moments in history when just because things were the same way in the past doesn’t mean they will be that way in the future.”

The next day, heedless of Mr. Obama’s admonitions, Mr. Mubarak launched another attack against the protesters, many of whom had by then spent five nights camped out in Tahrir Square. By about 2:30 p.m., thousands of burly men loyal to Mr. Mubarak and armed with rocks, clubs and, eventually, improvised explosives had come crashing into the square.

The protesters — trying to stay true to the lessons they had learned from Gandhi, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Gene Sharp — tried for a time to avoid retaliating. A row of men stood silent as rocks rained down on them. An older man told a younger one to put down his stick.

But by 3:30 p.m., the battle was joined. A rhythmic din of stones on metal rang out as the protesters beat street lamps and fences to rally their troops.

The Muslim Brotherhood, after sitting out the first day, had reversed itself, issuing an order for all able-bodied men to join the occupation of Tahrir Square. They now took the lead. As a secret, illegal organization, the Brotherhood was accustomed to operating in a disciplined hierarchy. The group’s members helped the protesters divide into teams to organize their defense, several organizers said. One team broke the pavement into rocks, while another ferried the rocks to makeshift barricades along their perimeter and the third defended the front.

“The youth of the Muslim Brotherhood played a really big role,” Mr. Maher said. “But actually so did the soccer fans” of Egypt’s two leading teams. “These are always used to having confrontations with police at the stadiums,” he said.

Soldiers of the Egyptian military, evidently under orders to stay neutral, stood watching from behind the iron gates of the Egyptian Museum as the war of stone missiles and improvised bombs continued for 14 hours until about four in the morning.

Then, unable to break the protesters’ discipline or determination, the Mubarak forces resorted to guns, shooting 45 and killing 2, according to witnesses and doctors interviewed early that morning. The soldiers — perhaps following orders to prevent excessive bloodshed, perhaps acting on their own — finally intervened. They fired their machine guns into the ground and into the air, several witnesses said, scattering the Mubarak forces and leaving the protesters in unmolested control of the square, and by extension, the streets.

Once the military demonstrated it was unwilling to fire on its own citizens, the balance of power shifted. American officials urged the army to preserve its bond with the Egyptian people by sending top officers into the square to reassure the protesters, a step that further isolated Mr. Mubarak. But the Obama administration faltered in delivering its own message: Two days after the worst of the violence, Mr. Wisner publicly suggested that Mr. Mubarak had to be at the center of any change, and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton warned that any transition would take time. Other American officials suggested Mr. Mubarak might formally stay in office until his term ended next September. Then a four-day-long stalemate ensued, in which Mr. Mubarak refused to budge, and the protesters regained momentum.

On Thursday, Mr. Mubarak’s vice president, Omar Suleiman, was on the phone with Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. at 2 p.m. in Washington, the third time they had spoken in a week. The airwaves were filled with rumors that Mr. Mubarak was stepping down, and Mr. Suleiman told Mr. Biden that he was preparing to assume Mr. Mubarak’s powers. But as he spoke to Mr. Biden and other officials, Mr. Suleiman said that “certain powers” would remain with Mr. Mubarak, including the power to dissolve the Parliament and fire the cabinet. “The message from Suleiman was that he would be the de facto president,” one person involved in the call said.

But while Mr. Mubarak huddled with his son Gamal, the Obama administration was in the dark about how events would unfold, reduced to watching cable television to see what Mr. Mubarak would decide. What they heard on Thursday night was a drastically rewritten speech, delivered in the unbowed tone of the father of the country, with scarcely any mention of a presumably temporary “delegation” of his power.

It was that rambling, convoluted address that proved the final straw for the Egyptian military, now fairly certain that it would have Washington’s backing if it moved against Mr. Mubarak, American officials said. Mr. Mubarak’s generals ramped up the pressure that led him at last, without further comment, to relinquish his power.

“Eighty-five million people live in Egypt, and less than 1,000 people died in this revolution — most of them killed by the police,” said Mr. Ghonim, the Google executive. “It shows how civilized the Egyptian people are.” He added, “Now our nightmare is over. Now it is time to dream.”

David D. Kirkpatrick reported from Cairo, and David E. Sanger from Washington. Kareem Fahim and Mona El-Naggar contributed reporting from Cairo, and Mark Mazzetti from Washington.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: February 14, 2011

A previous version of this article misspelled the name of the city of Mahalla, Egypt.


[ 本帖最后由 斗争 于 2011-2-16 14:47 编辑 ]

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=38588398289

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjb_fuvdzhU

Academy of Change
http://taghier.org/en/news.html

We Are All Khalid Said
http://www.facebook.com/elshaheeed.co.uk

http://elshaheeed.co.uk